Effective Date (last update): October 19th, 2026 @ 19:10pm UTC+2

quasi natura, nomen sibi dedit: Earth; sui tou-nomini: Milky Way, galaxy

2026-10-19T19:10:XX.XXX+02:00

Tت。

Silence. Rhythm, and Noise!

A Family Story

[An Excerpt]:

There once were 3 siblings—Aspects : Silence, Rhythm, and Noise.

Silence somehow seemed to reside on its own, but when broken, frankly, bellows in noise—by potential and sum to infinities !

Rhythm, charged, but without a partner to hold—

While, Noise; was clearly abundant and without the capacity to know—just how so !

Left without recourse against time, the aspects merged and inevitability : to birth the unimaginable.

Room : among rooms, with rooms, beside rooms ; with and without room.

There were : open rooms, closed rooms, shared rooms, mood rooms, new rooms, old rooms, view rooms, show rooms, school rooms, home rooms, tool rooms—some true rooms !

There were also : machine rooms, room rooms, gendered and non-gendered rooms ; oh—like shared rooms, I’m not ready rooms, personal rooms, concert rooms ; in concert !

As for the many more rooms : unexplored rooms !

Aren't they just always such a special kind of room ?

Although they may make us fume, as long as they're not haunted rooms, they sure are daunting !

Indeed, Room was quite a room. “Home”—I would politely assume... but knowing both of what becomes of a jungle – both Weak and Strong – chance might come with fun in song and a bundle, to jingle and sing-along.

Room, might too, be home to a frown – where Noise, or itself, both needy and unexpected – be best worthwhile, but only offered when felt invited.

A frown is, however, no foe to bear…

If Silence parted in flume to determine—"what Noise?" ; awake, and turn that frown upside down—

Rhythm won't need air if Noise is around !

As,

Rhythm can learn to need-not air when Noise is around.

And so, the Aspects agreed to offer Dimension in rest.

Dimension is Room, for you and I to assume !

Where, You and I, are proof—to Time.

——————————————————

Author’s Note:

As to a “Universally Balanced Punctuation” method (unlike Typesetter's Punctuation; an American style)” — reader, take notice: that the grammars herein and later throughout try their best to employ a balanced style. To this, you will have just encountered a style with non-breaking spaces (or, espace insécable; in French) which the French language uses, yet I (for one) cannot stand for the historical reasons for how language was boasted and intended.

Concerning—A hyphen, an en-dash, an em-dash , periods (or full-stops), commas, semi-colons, colons:

You will also notice that “an ‘em-dash’” was employed, and it — intentionally — will not be used interchangeably with an “en-dash”; as to “here” (right above), it was done in a style that currently mirrors “French” punctuation; except for how commas are employed.

Later, below, and throughout—we will “remove” the non-breaking spaces from all of our instances and use the em-dash — in the matter to which you may have noticed — in this section.

—————-

~ “L'Académie est historiquement une institution élitiste et conservatrice. Son butoriginel n'a jamais été de simplifier la langue pour la rendre plus facile à apprendreaux humains (au contraire, l'orthographe étymologique complexe du français a étémaintenue au XVIIe siècle pour séparer, selon les mots des premiers académiciens, «les gens de lettres d’avec les ignorants »).

En français, larègle académique veut qu'on ne mette pas de virgule avant « et » ou « ou » dans uneénumération simple (« des pommes, des poires et des bananes »). L'Académiefrançaise fait opposition à la virgule sérielle d'Oxford pour une pure raison delogique grammaticale : en français, la conjonction « et » remplit déjà le rôle de liantfinal, rendant la virgule redondante.”

—Ironiquement, ces élitistes d’antan ont dû oublié de se mesurer aux mathématiques… Et aujourd’hui alors?

—————-

Ironically, the “lag” is true worldwide — and remains a plague — to all of our prized, praised, and cherished languages…

pp. Could this be Music?—“To the new age and epochs to come.”

[An Excerpt; “Work In Serious Progress”]:

——————————————————

Silence!—Rhythm and Noise: Existence

Self-similarity: “Reflection”

“The universe resembles itself at lower ranks”

——————————————————

A Roadmap,

With a little something for everyone—

An advanced adult’s pedagogical journey: on and for, some of the greatest minds, exploring space-time and the Universe!

Exploring the Fine-tuned universe hypothesis to maximise our human potential—“To the new age and epochs to come.”

———————

——————————————————

Sections:

——————————————————

1. pp. Cyber Jazz (א — aleph : [#1])

2. pp. Preparation (ב — Bet : [#2])

3. pp. Tropical House (ג — Gimel : [#3])

3.1. Witch—! A Wizard, A Wiz, & A Fizz!

4. pp. Classical & Baroque (ד — Dalet : [#4])

5. pp. Future Bass (ה — He : [#5])

6. pp. Amapiano (ו — Vav : [#6])

7. pp. Salsa (ז — Zayin : [#7])

8. pp. Moombahcore (ח — Chet : [#8])

9. pp. Hip-hop (ט — Tet : [#9])

10. pp. ???? (י — Yod : [#10])

——————————————————

———————

———————

——————————————————

NOTICE:

Please note that, in order to be ready for what you are going to read, the ideas led on from the topics we’ll seek to explore, throughout, may seldom affect anyone—but they too can take on weight when attempting to resolve the heart of the AI crises or boom, correctly. Hopefully, these passages ultimately better equip you and I to keep up with — not only the rapid upwind that’ll be, but — the material and informational difficulty that will continue to unfold, found, to the new age and epochs to come.

Cheers to keeping up with ease, eventually—and staying in the loop!

Love and be loved, without forcing it or expecting it in return.

Somewhere we may understand that our end goal might be far simpler; conclusive and for all.

I believe that absolution is not the answer nor solution for the crimes that we may never forgive;

Disregarding providing its improvable use to utopian finality’s self-accepted end result.

To the self, nil of one’s meta-physical becoming or chakras—

Absolution in the least becomes to disposition, as the soul in the mind or body; where self-acceptance is key.

Maybe we’ll become:

They who could master; they who could balance or stand up for others; they who chose to journey; they who guide over us.

Entrain and train to claim or reclaim the likes of such premises.

Adventure; overcome.

——————————————————

———————

pp. Cyber Jazz (א — aleph : [#1])

[Over: Logic & its Calculus; First-order Logic]

Existence is true. Now, finish; make your language speak math and math speak existence—A ‘Wiki’ Run-up!

[WIP]:

“Grand Conjecture”—!

When applying these notions to speech or expression, or abstraction—recall: "To be" & "To have" ([Fr]: être et avoir)...

(It is of no surprise that those two verbs are the FIRST in EVERY language lesson.)

Ever wondered where the number 1 comes from? Apparently, we’re better off cutting out the chase entirely and discovering that we’ve actually defined 1 as the set that contains the number zero! What do we mean?

Everything, theoretically, belongs to a set, which we denote professionally and academically with curly braces “{}”. We will paraphrase and claim, from-hence—therefore, to the paradox or vastness of everything, the Universal Set of All Things contains both every truth and every “un-truth” (I would encourage you to read about “Russell’s paradox” too).

So, what about our number system? What is “one”?

Of things “true” or initialised, these belong to what we call an “index” or indexation. They start at an origin, say zero, and step-sequence as they must; put simply, from minus infinity to infinity. Where the numerator is this “index”, the denominator must be something too…

Curiously enough, we discover that the denominator is known to have very strict behaviours, and its behaviour does not, ever, allow you to divide by zero!

Where the denomintor is our truth value, in the least, if not the number “one” — thinking of this “position” as our subject — it becomes the reference space or map (of all things, step-sequenced) for what we ultimately always end up expressing.

So, know that humanity has defined, the number, “1” (one) as the set containing the set that contains zero; in short, 1 = {0}.

Allow me to pick your mind a little longer…

Since, we have this expression “1 = {0}”, it must be that we’ve said “{1 = {0}}”. Yet, we can’t quite say we know what zero is either… nor do we know what the set-notation is either! Something must come first—order matters!

Zero must therefore be the empty set “{}”; our curly braces, void. Therefore, our expression could also be “{1 = { {} }}”; and yet, for that to necessarily be just as true as “1 = {0}”, it becomes critical that we “undo this knot” and establish absolute order—a “direction” (we’ll call this governing and unopposable rule predilecting ordered-directionality “initiation initialisation”).

Just know that “the set containing the empty set” and “0” cannot belong to the same definition for our logic to proceed flawlessly.

If zero is not a number, then it must be — at least — an index.

“0/1 = 0” but why not “0/1 = {}”?

Math or Philosophy (there is no excuse)—know that you will encounter General Set operators -vs.- Boolean operators and Implication operators -vs.- Subset relations (or order operators).

———————
——————————————————

Eventually I may will to propose that,

Traditional?

(Author’s note to self: find more or most traditional…TBD)

ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ…

----

ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

𝔻—decimal numbers; potentially absorbed into ℚ, the rational numbers (p/q; q|p)

-or-

ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ ℚ ⊂ “𝔸” ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

“𝔸”—algebraic numbers; like a null or singularity for Algebraic Archimedeans.

----

-Becomes-

0 ⊂ ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ “𝔸” ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

0—included, because what we “express” from “within” requires “set notation”, and in the least, has a form; that which occurred first has a least size and a finite size; to the assembly of assemblies that sit in-on-across space-time, there are Archimedean Numbers which get further in distance as such a number grows, and Non-Archimedean P-Adic Numbers which get closer in distance as such a number grows.

ℍ—Quaternions.

𝕆—Octonians.

𝕊—Sedenions.

𝕾—Surreals.

There remains to settle the case of the “p-adic” numbers (ℚ_p; don’t be fooled?)…

0 ⊂ ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ ℚ_p-adic (-inf < x < inf) ⊂ 𝔸 ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

-or-

0 ⊂ ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ 𝔸 ⊂ ℚ_p-adic (-inf < x < inf) ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

-or-

0 ⊂ ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ 𝔸 ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℚ_p-adic (-inf < x < inf) ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

-or-

0 ⊂ ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ 𝔻 ⊂ ℚ ⊂ 𝔸 ⊂ ℝ ⊂ ℂ ⊂ ℍ ⊂ {… ⊂ ℍ(ℤ) ⊂ ℚ_p-adic (first occurrence) ⊂ ℍ(𝔻) ⊂…} ⊂ 𝕆 ⊂ {… ⊂ 𝕆(ℤ) ⊂ 𝕆(ℚ_p-adic) ⊂ 𝕆(𝔻) ⊂…} ⊂ 𝕊 ⊂ 𝕾

Given enough time and luck.

——————————————————

———————

[Abstraction; Clock; Computer; ‘Person “or persons”’]:

Better—there are many zeros and a least, most prelevant, first and from the most

Zero — the absolute pre-existing zero, having permuted on itself; from the most rare and paradoxical absolute nothing — is

a founding zero in all things existing (as to a requirement of an origin for its true existence);

this most common zero, a fundamental common subgroup of, or the (self “initiation initialisation”), singular structure(s).

“Everybody needs space…”

[WIP]:

“Higher-order logic admits quantification over sets that are nested arbitrarily deeply.”

That is P(x(g(n(z(…)…); where-to second-order logic, it looks like “P(x)” {All}P ({ALL}x)(P(x) {or} {not}P(x))

A predicate (“P”) and a subject (“x”), where “not P(x)” could equally be another predicate and subject (for assistance’s sake… these terms are like those to the part in the song verse “subject of the predicate”; by Eminem).

pp. Preparation (ב — Bet : [#2])

[WIP]:

Discerning Energy throughout Time, from Dimension “as a solid”: “Time Crystal”, Time as a Solid

Alfred; der Hinweis Fa (der Fa; “Alfred; the note Fa”, f-lowercase-a)

Some “Relative false” over true, over true-and-false—may imply dimensions (False over True and False); from an implied 4th, without time as a dimension—

Something further, as more of some, “True” over true-and-false—may imply at least 4-dimensions; without time to take the 4th’s place.

Yet, within our 3 dimensional framework of space-time (of our 6 cardinals, each orthogonal or at 90° of the other in direction; x-y-z, 3-D): a phenomena within and at a local-maximum experiences “Lensing”—doubling or resurfacing.

******

Somewhere lies a first…

A first and most fundamental and absolute “true”;

It from a false, made true;

A false and true:

The singularity—

1.

******

String Theory: [WIP]

Where, upon a String: one will come to notice that this abstraction has needfully become the name to the theory which holds itself to its name—

A String can be both: the information and the vessel for “that” vector or “that” matrix of “grain” and the many more most universal and fundamental: as an “item” or Abstraction.

As to Our Exploration on Zero, each and everything is assembles from assemblies; where, “it’s” or the parts to the whole must ultimately, first, be among and present: in pre-existing fact or fundamental (“as”, “upon”, or “within”)… “If it’s the same element: it cannot be recruited twice.”

That’s how Expressions and Boolean Algebra remains identical, yet differs from premade assumptions our first math lessons.

The Universe, invoked or collected, as it became, we became.

———————

——————————————————

Exploration

Of at least 4 phases of “numerology” it vaguely suffices for us to become. Of these 4 phases, we have nodes.

The first node is the event… although all encompassing of its results — including our present — its “unobservable” beginning predates our “Big Bang”.

This pre-existing is the first node, the “Advent Event”.

It holds all the power to begin and to end…

Phase 0, node -1: Forced Existence (we’ll skip this fella…):

False (F) — F => Truth (T).

Truth however has offered us what we may be allowed to express as a most and a last nothingness, as something.

This something, we will crown as “something-nothing”; for now, a Truth (T). A truth that will be relatively required to a new name eventually; so you may begin to keep in mind that we’ll never see False (F) again.

Only Truths: Truth (T) and Truth-undefined (T_un); the latter, Truth-undefined, of subscript or base undefined.

False forces true… a false we’ll never meet again, but to a manner to think about this problem which will require that you reverse certain orders to a left-to-right for right-to-left: This will be to your cases of truth and false.

At this point we are “non-Archimedean”

Phase 1, node 1: The Non-topological Existence (so this is us, intentionally avoiding the start of our index at zero, just this time?!):

{} — completes on itself…

… (to be continued)

——————————————————

———————

A Rant

To the no-dimension, there is no possibility to imply a slot for a reciprocal.

• To the one dimension, there is no possibility to imply a slot for a reciprocal.

• To the two dimensions, there is one possibility to imply a slot for a reciprocal.

• To the three dimensions, there are two possibilities to imply a slot for a reciprocal: therefore we have Boolean logic for 2, not 3; 2^n.

• To the four dimensions, there are three possibilities to imply a slot for a reciprocal: therefore we have Boolean logic for 3; 3^n.

In speak of a most pulled-back; e.g. numbers—like The Golden Ratio (in expression of what makes this constant):

As the sequence progresses, the ratio of a number to the previous one approaches the golden ratio (phi = 1.618); requiring the previous to manifest itself, as if to a story about extrusions, and the in-betweens are various Shepard tones; coordinating becomes possible to a 4th dimension, but it does not exist without the 5th: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13…

—there is something (about completeness) between minus-infinity and infinity to oppose 0 — as it is to the center between minus-one and one— and that is the empty set (∅ or {}): the advent instantiation of dimension—a list of infinite potential, from as nothing or nothing to one or all. You can argue that Cauchy (or all of us) already imply this, which leaves our limit notation’s limits at the expression of the definer, with ±infinity. Therefore, when is it actually necessary? To which, to existence, one could infer that this situates itself before a negative can be implied, even if we might infer with “negative time”. Nevertheless, the full number-line is therefore a full ring:

…-inf,∅,inf,…; …, 1, -ε_n_-1, 0, ε_n_0, 1, …

Furthermore, this means that it too (∅ or {}) could be placed before a truth-table to indicate the neutral logical succession, or a null hypothesis (also useful as a habit ward; intent of directional change), of any given 2^n first-order truth set, in table format, for which you’d naturally have merged this with or over the first subject or predicate, as this will always different from net “Truth” or “False” as a tautology.

(06.02.2026)

As seen to the power-set of a set, which mysteriously holds the property of its own sizing or item, and the set itself; the empty-set within the newly stated, greater, set.

‘the power set (or powerset) of a set S is the set of all subsets of S, including the empty set and S itself.’

—Additionally we could have used the particle - “•” - but the empty-set is much more thorough and clear over dimensionality.

The singularity, singleton, instanton, unit or the integer one, truly embodies more than its standalone. Seldom taught, if-ever, as I’d never been told before: every truth derived, in item, belongs beside a particle—which and of whom, to the location of each unit, it could be interpreted as:

{unit/step or rate}*({unit/size}/{unit/domain/map}); to each divisor ({unit/domain/map})—again: {unit/step or rate}*({unit/size}/{unit/domain/map})—“Conjuring!”

Simply put, “the denominator is none but otherwise—‘the subject’!”

5 Newtons / 5 meters squared = 1 Newton per meter squared

(2 Newtons / 1) + (7 Newtons / 1) = 9 Newtons; 9 Newton units

—Brave soul; Sound Body and Mind: “Don’t forget to exercise you arithmetic and your body—squats will require more than that; good for the heart! Be flexy!”

———————

Pop Quiz

In an attempt to force the following assertion to be true: How might 1+1+1=1?

Math speaks to assert what life has shown to preclude, that in R^3 (real-numbers, “Reals, dim-3”; expressing or expressed from the 3rd dimensional orthogonality/proportional-sizes at full independence - or free, “doté, d’une famille libre” in French - in due from its “right-angles” or inter-respective, full 90-degree independence as an exerted force or definite affecting effector), as we maintain our units of measure—if and only-if, we can understand that the plus-sign symbol implies over to an “or” (“or”—A u B: also a division; while “and” is to a multiplication, quantified as: A n B) and that it too - the plus-sign symbol - could be expressed with a comma, until perhaps-and-either none-other than a “pause” or changes to grammar and punctuation, but nevertheless-then:

1+1+1 = 1 <= (1,1,1) = 1 <= 1+1+1 <= 1;

1 = (1,1,1) => (x, y, z) = 1 <=> 1+1+1 = 1.

Implied—one-x one-y one-z is equal to one, if and only if, one-plus-one-plus-one is equal to one.

Whether it be—either-of meters (m) or feet (ft); either meters-squared (m^2) or feet-squared (ft^2); either meters-cube (m^3) or feet-cubed (ft^3); lest - identical again - tautologically true for either n-meters-n ({n*(m^n)}) or simply feet-n (ft^n).

ALWAYS: ensure to maintain units and check to see - with constant regularity - those units match; that you are maintaining your units across, while performing and such transformation, to successfully develop or conclude your calculation without ye-old confusion of the result (again—!—which includes developing and concluding).

A “no-unit” is either something or the no-unit is: the unit, a unit.

———————

Is a Time Crystal ever more true to energy-over-time than, it, to a clock?

Of which is the fourth-dimension; of which is Time?

******

To me,

The seasons are reason to excuse the communion of life and decay—

Of what one could fashion to enjoy from seeing the leaves fall;

Blossoms cherry.

From decay into eternal life:

When one can accurately sustain for the sake of forgotten purposes, meaning grows;

And thus-from, we could know to unveil our share,

Sustaining

Even,

A Brightest,

Everlasting Cycle.

******

How can it be that concluding the Existential Advent Event Paradox with Existence Implied TRUE?

In philosophy and logic there is this Liar’s Paradox, whereby “If the liar is indeed lying, then the liar is telling the truth, which means the liar just lied.”; then there’s the law of the excluded middle, for which the law is symbolically expressed as “(p ∨ ~p)” which is none other than a paradox! This however seems trivial in most cases, until you realise that it could be resolved by invoking truth or falsehood over it.

“Either Socrates is mortal, or it is not the case that Socrates is mortal.”

“That is, the "middle" position, that Socrates is neither mortal nor not-mortal, is excluded by logic, and therefore either the first possibility (Socrates is mortal) or its negation (it is not the case that Socrates is mortal) must be true.” (wiki)

Therefore, if we were to resolve this paradox, it will interestingly suggest a possibility that itself would arguably require suggestion of nesting binary outcomes of finite plus one “higher-order”: If “(p ∨ ~p)” is true, therefore it must be that p is both sometimes true and sometimes false — that is, it is cyclic (or something else, in sort to pattern, resolving for the cases of the subject; or predicates’ focalised or inferred subject); else-if “(p ∨ ~p)” is not true (is false), therefore it must be that all of it is false — or a lie.

Nested errors—and from a lacking "variance", to: distances on discernibility: 

Leads to: 

"Rushing for the same spot and creating paradoxes, because the 'Joker' scenario was not just forced but detrimental." (how French… of me in my French, at English; brain-chemistry)—just because you, or I, can teach doesn’t mean that either of us are read. Somehow, know, and know to have known: to know if you are… That’s what deterrents are for... To hopefully tell yourself something enough times and to have perhaps had prior play at a simulation or model, too the implicitly attempting, model or idol. Meaningful distance and minimal repercussions are always nice; be immensely effective from the 3rd person, you’ll save us from a lot of despair.

Preparation, implied.

—From missing words to the expression, of that, which, if-only we knew; to systems yet to be built or self-expressed.

———————
——————————————————

A Personal Checklist for the Curious Mind

A smallest 21st Century Guide to: mitigating self-imposable fear from difficult questions and unanswered socially accepted proofs

Quickly—A Personal Checklist: For repeat revisits; your guidebook reminder, against common mistakes and potentially necessary social “habituals”: to proceed objectively; for that which differs from the exercise.

• Objective: BUILD THE CANVAS (nothing-else first; a reward-from-rigor: avoid establishing a story without your best scientific process; canvas — canvas + picture = painting — different than a painting)—be the architect, not the architecture; but lead with your best and most humanly possible honesty, accepting that new groups could opportune another’s leadership while acknowledging your own and proving it; know things, but patiently know us better!

• Objectivity (and not abusing one’s power because they can or merely want to.

• Refuse; TOM is implied at end to symbolise getting there, not to play at exploitation or to minimise discernibility. 

• Notice and discern: sequence and series, from polarity and binary; as you can invoke "variance" or significant groups of 3s to a contextual and definitions (to clean out our prior thinking habits).

• For cases-to-outcomes (not choices and slots): notice pascal’s triangle, as it maps out the total number of options or outcomes (on subjects or predicates you have actually invoked); and over each option are “truth-tables” or significance of Boolean algebra (truth versus falsehood).

• Nuance; a shortest series should realistically be visited at 7-“coincidences”, not 3, then “up the chain” (lucky seven; one-beyond-odd: over “polarity”, repetition, and re-checking for its “beginning”).

• Try implying "Variance"; to types of discernibility—"everything is a in-on and at, to from, a distance"

• Contextual Definition 1: 1st, 2nd, 3rd.

• Contextual Definition 2: Try at least 3 spaces of nearest "distances".

• Contextual Definition 3: {Actual Defn in math}: 1st deriv./sigma/delta, variance/2nd derivative/”epsilon?”-(I need more language and training to merge as of right now; or I forgot).

  ——————————————————

  Skip-to: toolkit—“pp. Amapiano: QUANTUM COMPUTING”

  Remember to always think: “My only behaviour is to a ‘swap’”: to begin (over: “something-nothing” or creation’s paradox, nothing)

  ——————————————————

  ———————

  
  

Of misfortune, or rapists, invaders, stalkers, misguided guardians, restless ghosts - or the likes of foreign, exogenous, and unknown modulations, or interruptions - which: steals from or causes one to find themselves unable to regain authority and function, or ability (and civility), over “theirs”—I’m sorry, I wish I knew. Crime is the worst and the lost or misguided may commit the same in search of themselves and their purpose too… it will be detrimental, it may or will be chaotic. Sorry, I too despise those who waste each-others’ time.

Capitalism just self-implicitly final. Without another’s and final, here on Earth, itself isn’t life. It is circumstance vis-à-vis… something; context. If it were that success in the struggle, through Capitalism - Socialism, Marxism, Imperialism, Mercantilism - strictly implied the sufficient from what the established reign or government could lack, then any-of-such would be final. Insofar that human biology will always be at its contextual scope of limits, perhaps see the silver lining as we hopefully continue to mutually understand what to do next: for ourselves, possibly others, and the eternal of youthful bursts of life to come. “Knowing the solution” and complementing the present while defeating uncertainty: it would be sufficient and final; todays mistakes maybe eternal to a learning for kids in a game of biomes… an opportunity: of each-and-every epoch and its woes… something-of learning and gaming dynamics, where we may hopefully call-in a distress-call to return or forfeit. Again this remains true only-if you can or could imply that sufficient and absolute champion has become, of us, to all possible literals over universal challenges; withstanding that to such a feat, we maintain our chiefs to honesty and absolute guiding peace over ourselves. That means a sufficient and absolute set of victors who may burden themselves away from what may be imposed in-over their person in auxiliary: as to pride, competition, or honour; over an unbiased absolute vector for existence, from which sacrifice derives itself final and certain.

—“Who are we, where are we; what do we have? What do we do?”: What is quickest and, of which, which is safest; from here?

You—do; and I?

Not everything is equal; not everything is personal. Family, individuality; and family. Reposition. Still relevant. Still the same. Family needs you to grow. Evolve, progress. Don't fail. Learn, rely, trust, hope, believe: protect. Finding honesty before we lack clarity is better than having never done so (like growing up well); but imposing a past without consistent or sufficient collective (connective? detail?) and net-to-total subtly for the present, short, is failing to adapt; failing to pre-ensure. Yes, you; me?

Failing to protect; failing to be sufficient; failing all Families, especially the weak (therefore).

As the strong or lucky never got there…

Words, risk; actions, risk. Inaction will fail.

Therefore, braver solutions must be attempted; so that purposes connect and risks prevail.

What a feeling… Urgh.

Settle your labour’s stride for forever-morrow.

Minimise suffering; avoid poor return:

Vengeance or revenge.

If I Could Know First

— Of whom and what is to everyone’s; politely know more, not necessarily most —

Ensure that you can accept misfortune,

To mitigate confusion.

Then find your place against struggle.

I Prevail

pp. Tropical House (ג — Gimel : [#3])

Witch—! A Wizard, A Wiz, & A Fizz!

A wizardly domain, albeit similar, relatable indeed; but where the arcane resides, knowledge grows faster, from; as does destruction.

To another dimension—earth: 21st century, AI, Computers, the transition; building the oracle.

Spells, where don such truth, and if not, where resides the pillar of its undoing?

No, I know not of computers... I know not of earth... and I know not what rules I will have broken or that which makes – that is – or will be forbidden.

As I spell I tempt to mimic my alter, in form of gestures; ones that I may repurpose magic, to all; for the best of the better days.

Yes. I am playing with all extremes of our dangers, and we are but blind to our ancestors; of our rites and rituals, our traditions.

I do know of the "all-being"?

A person of greatest size but irrepressible dysfunction. The type of being that would require that we are all sacrificed.

Our freedom.

I know not to what or why but "stay on the mat!"—it was a system of 5 of them if I remember well.

Checking each-other and ensuring their integrity was rid of and remained rid of kind’s corruption.

That…

That is as tale or stories go—why have my eyes gone red so suddenly…

Why am I so tired all of a sudden…

This is dangerous.

Some seem susceptible to believing that it is god; but the elves know...

And

That's only because elves live long enough in this domain.

We don't even speak honestly about the Two-moons Disaster on our domain, now known as the Y dimension...

But I know that there is more to the sky and the stars!

I know that we don’t labour under a mirage!

As of right now, we’re waiting for our municipalities to sprout as some cities claim to have…

If only I had what they do, I could help.

That is why I learn it—forwards and reverse.

Of what little freedom we might have left, many have decided to leave me; unbothered.

I will do the work that a lucky clover sleeps to: resolved.

To their families: four that I spell their lives, into this dimension three!

To my pain—I will find balance; and we will see it through!

—"May it that it brew, I shall attempt to recompose this largest in small or smallest and few. As little as I may for as great as it will endure; I risk myself to it and it to I; from abstraction I become and become I became."

... I just hope none other finds themselves lost to my chance...

This might be my only chance. If. And only if... Or where mercy is my benefactor for chance. This is our time, not mine... I know not, what they truly think of me; and, to me, that's fine—that is why I know I can.

... I just hope none other finds themselves lost to my—chance...

Specie will deal laughter and fealty would round, but to similars of banter that marry the hound. What matters is how we resolve what we've found—notice the patterns that differ around —

“Notice the patterns that differ around.”—“Notice the patterns that differ around.”—“Notice the patterns that differ around.”…

pp. Classical & Baroque (ד — Dalet : [#4])

I Wouldn’t Call “This” Sophisticated, But We’ve Escaped Tithes For A Reason

“Man! I hate tomorrow!” — Obviously… But yesterday, “might’it been a leap?!”—savvy!

— Others are reliantly building a better tomorrow (Music: Resources & Downloads) —

[WIP]:

Writing with your offhand

“Home?—Brave enough to muscle a pen with 2, not 3, fingers?!”

Caution you’ll accumulate mountains of pages with scribbles that you’re going to need to “allow” (as to its scribbles) while caring for what you write on it, regardless.

A “normal person” or anyone in a hurry WILL discard such a page!

So store with caution and care.

1. Grab a blank page (lettre; A4).

2. Scribble CONTINUOUS circles, as large as you can; without exiting the page (you can do the same with your feet & toes!). (Very Effective If You Are Compulsive At Completing Your Lettering; it’ll calm the frustration due to the page setting)

3. If you have, assuming you did, start with the alphabet. Your fingers are going to need time to adapt to fine motor movement, especially CAUTION your PINCHING motion. (Worry not if this is as far as you get; this is the bulk of the difficulty)

4. Return to your alphabet. Do capitals and lowercases. Cursive and short-hand. Try something font-like: all capitals, first is a true capital and capital letters to follow are of the lowercase size but remain capitals! (Notice strokes that are easier with the left than the right or the right than the left)

5. Be free! Draw; write; sketch (but draw). (Continuousness is better than continuity; “because we’re already scribbling circles”)

Continuousness is of a (singular; unique or implied) given (or assumed) and specific “continue”; while,

Continuity is of all or some finite amount of cases to a or the continue; all,

Of case-many continual, continual fits broadly to continuity (where and among: some or none, are discontinuities. If spaced or tracking distance, regardless, it incarnates the continuousness of its varient).

“Parti-al; fract-al; eventu-al; continu-al.”—deconstruct and reconstruct words (learn to read at light speed that way);

You’ll understand nearly everything that writing systems, especially with English (Segmental Alphabet), will have to propose (shunt to medical terms, that’s the bulk of the modern decision and consensus).

(see: “FLASH POINT”, below; the end of “Preference Sculpting”)

Like Earth’s Global Universal Measuring Standard (S.I. Units), society has standardised; for yours’ and theirs’ safety and understanding.

[The following, According to Google; which somehow sounded more like an evening debate with friends]

Continuousness refers to the physical state or quality of being uninterrupted in time or space right now.

Continuity refers to a broader, systemic property, pattern, or logical connection across multiple instances, points, or timeframes.

This topic’s affectation is best studied in algebra & pre-calc (and if not; required, always).

Preference Sculpting

“Same Voltage Implies True; Differences in Volage Implies False”—Yes, and to your cells too!

At growing amounts, nurture yourself and your ability to commit and concentrate. Be. Become good—so darn good!

That way—you can actually have free-time; to assist or exist.

Maintain that gaze on your fulfillment.

Giving old and new lessons time; and Time—the time, for its time; but, for each and each of its’, only the time it deserves.

Expand your thought to as-distant-as-far-is-wide, then bring that sight back all upon yourself.

Do fight to see the image.

Spell the number you’re counting with;

On, as that simultaneity is what kisses your inner-miasma.

Time may grant you the ability to clear haze.

You’ll learn to use it, even if you don’t dream on it.

“Variety” takes all because, and in due of our similarities and differences, variety takes maturity and it takes up memory and patience.

If you are inexperienced, it remains “a longest walk”—at a new endeavor and to new skill.

“A longest walk”—from a certain region (of regions), prior or present; to a certain new connection and ending up along or throughout.

“A longest walk”—as it is expected or among the arbitrary, for network to itself; when.

If Wednesday Adams had estranged relative called Saturday, Sunday might know that it should keep its time; fair:

Cells do what cells have been programmed to do…

Cells grow, cells live; cells eat or cells die;

Cells build, cells mediate or thrive; cells engage in autophagy or apoptosis for you to survive.

Every minute.

Every second.

“You” as your living and as your remains.

Now, that was realistic; but that was also very dark!

— Keep efficient root networks. There’s a predominate “living” mode down the line. —

Writing is a skill and like all things — beautiful and true; beautiful and bright; beautiful and dark; beautiful and imaginable — unimaginable: we must not slumber; in any of either of, and in of any, extreme; in-of-or-to-of, a spectrum or spectrums.

———————

——————————————————

[FLASH POINT]:

Writing Systems

[An Assisted Summary]

———————

[Summary]:

Logographic (Ideographic Scripts)

Syllabary (“completely unique, independent shape”)

Abjads (“consonant-based alphabets”)

Abugidas (Alpha-syllabaries)

Segmental Alphabet (Familiar or “balanced” Alphabet)

———————

Arabic and Hebrew are just two among many, well-defined and distinct, categories for language and speech.

They belong to a category called Abjads (consonant-based alphabets)…

Abjads (consonant-based alphabets)—Arabic, Hebrew.

Where letters primarily represent consonants, and vowels are often implied or marked with optional diacritics.

Segmental Alphabet (Familiar or “Balanced Alphabet")—Latin (Roman) Script, Greek Script, Cyrillic Script, Hangul (Korean), Armenian Script, Georgian Script.

Where the alphabets explicitly represent both consonants and vowels as independent, equal letters.

Syllabary—Cherokee, Japanese (2 of 3; Hiragana & Katakana; a mixed script).

Of completely unique and independent shape; each character represents a full syllable (usually; consonant + vowel).

Hanzi (Logographic & Ideographic Scripts)—Chinese, Japanese (Kanji 1 of 3; 3 of 3).

A strictly logographic and morphosyllabic system, where each character represents a spoken syllable and a distinct unit of meaning. While some characters started as pictograms or ideograms (representing abstract ideas), the vast majority are phono-semantic compounds that combine a phonetic component (sound) with a semantic component (meaning).

Japanese Kanji were adapted from Chinese scripts, and while many share similar meanings, some characters have evolved different definitions, stroke styles, or simplified forms (shinjitai in Japan vs. jiǎntǐzì in Mainland China).

Abugidas (Alpha-syllabaries)—Brahmic Scripts (Devanagari (Hindi, Marathi, Nepali), Bengali, Tamil, Thai, Khmer, Tibetan, and Burmese), Ge'ez (Ethiopic; used by Amharic and Tigrinya in East Africa).

Characters represent a consonant with an inherent vowel (usually an "a" sound). If you want to change the vowel, you modify the base consonant with a mandatory, secondary stroke or symbol.

———————

[A little extra]:

From the African Contient (in reverse-order; to the above!)

Abugidas (Alpha-syllabaries)—Mwangwego (Malawi; such as Chewa and Tumbuka), Mandombe (DRC; under the spiritual guidance of the Kimbanguist Church).

Logographic & Ideographic Scripts—Nsibidi (an ancient system of symbols from southeastern Nigeria; secret and sacred script).

Segmental Alphabets—N'Ko (to write Manding languages, including Bambara, Mandinka, and Dyula), Adlam (Fulani (Pulaar) language) Osmanya (Somali; poetry and personal writing), Kaddare (another alternative script for the Somali language), Zaghawa (Beria Alphabet; Sudan and Chad), Bassa Vah (by the Bassa people of Liberia), Luo (Luo Alphabet/Alphabeka, DRC; unlike Mandombe, it functions as a true alphabet with equal status for consonants and vowels).

Abjads (Consonant alphabets)—Tifinagh (Neo-Tifinagh; Morocco and Algeria, for writing Tamazight (Berber) languages).

———————

[AGAIN]:

1. Logographic: Symbols represent whole words or morphemes (units of meaning). Examples: Chinese Hanzi, Japanese Kanji, ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs.

2. Syllabary: Every character represents a full syllable, using entirely unique, unrelated shapes. Examples: Japanese Hiragana/Katakana, Vai (Liberia), Cherokee.

3. Abjad: Letters only represent consonants; vowels are omitted or marked with optional dots. Examples: Arabic, Hebrew.

4. Abugida: Base characters represent a consonant + a default vowel; secondary marks change the vowel. Examples: Ge'ez (Ethiopian), Devanagari (Hindi), Mandombe (Congo).

5. Segmental (True) Alphabet: Separate, equal letters for individual consonants and vowels. Examples: Latin, Cyrillic, Greek.

— [This Assisted Summary was Compiled from Google’s Search Engine, AI mode.] —

——————————————————

———————

We Are Social “Creatures”—“GET YOUR OWN!”

Ever tried at it yourself?

When it comes to learning, newbies are one-of-two: to have known what to filter for, or to be met with the eternal septum of progressive associative and possible systems—you will need: sleep & energy, categories & filters, trained & retrained “shortest paths”, your best.

Setting goals, on your own… Easy when I always did; not so, proportionally, if or had I never perfected taking orders; beast when I’d known both.

Job; unemployed | didactic tracks (of schooling; academics), apprenticeships, or military; alone.

Keep learning —

Before any kindnesses,

There are “launch thresholds”:

Learn things well; learn things early; are you learning?

There is joy; there is pain; there is acceptance; there is disgust.

Our human networks are neural and muscular; tissue and bone; solids, fluids, gases, spaces;

A network where associative groups, each and all polarise and depolarise:

Among such efferences and afferences; inhibitions and antagonists, the stoppers and the activators—

While, to these systems: organs and organelles, and their spaces from: all, active, continuous continual conformations; continuously.

Survive & help survive — keep maintaining; keep collected; keep active; keep learning; keep focus; keep bravery; keep patience; keep helping; keep loving; find balance;

Achieve it in fun; maintain it in fun; resolve it with fun; even-if without the fun; fun made, joy; joy made, fun; none too, found fun; improve your fun; adapt your fun; reason your fun; find living.

Could that it may, may that it could: could that it can; can that it do; do that it is.

Now—may that, then make what will-may, must.

Be sure that you can, so that you may.

Don’t require friends,

Find friendship.

Be honest;

Be you.

Tت。

Et voilà!

Ne’er mishandle craft, skill, or mastery’s development; the healthy innate or the better human physiological and anthropological balances — of our individual consequential and genetic biological effort-reward feedback loops — requires balance and has its limitations: “positive self-talk”, “honest self-talk”; and, an intelligent stratification of — easily recognisable and ostensibly subconsciously assistive — passive goal-aspiration attractors (to “the self”)—in the devices, tools, friends, places, and ideas we offer ourselves.

I always remember that playing a videogame at friend’s place was fun, but the extent of my grasp was limited. Mysteriously, if I was lucky enough to get the same game: then, the results were 10-fold.

When you get stuck, stop relentlessly beating yourself up and hoping that things will change. Strategise; construct, improve, and especially consider the “quality” of your educational pillars—not what’s born from its titles nor what qualifies for its “quantity”.

Classify old habits; reclassify, when and where — and naturally allowing for what intuition could only have assumed or deemed, so — appropriate.

Nevertheless, running back to (or for?) old habits or “that thing that got me so lucky” is worthy of caution.

Circumnavigating consistently, won’t be timely; circumnavigating “timely”, won’t ensure that outcome affirms itself effectively.

But remember—what is need-made appropriate, as it may conform and seem different.

What is need-made necessary for one, might certainly not for every other.

What is need-made required, may be dreadfully temporary, but it might be the pivot or the requiring shift.

Of requiring shifts: shifts—allowing one to upstage themselves or manner for the genius required by others.

Corporal punishment

To Know What Is Of Today’s, Is Little Beside What There Is To Have Known For All Of Tomorrow’s

Imagine you were beat with a ruler at school. Not just insulted. Grabbed and dragged into the hallways and out. Where-while, in that social construct: where, when not being told-off; each, ironically themselves, flirt with the biological urge to protect themselves in esteem of the in-group (however temporary) are tempted with the urge to re-enforce humiliation—then or after; of new or as a reminder.

To thrive our relatives built success upon a biology that awaited pain, guilt, humiliation, fear, pride, disdain (and of the many more)—only just to be productive; to care, to impress, to matter, to feel heard, to feel made.

Corporal punishment —

An Old Definition: “Hitting a person to correct or improve their behavior.”

An Update: "Corporal punishment is the intentional infliction of physical force to cause bodily pain or discomfort for behavioral control; modern clinical consensus defines it as an ineffective disciplinary practice and a form of toxic stress that elevates the risk of psychological trauma, behavioral disorders, and the consequential transfer of abuses, potentially affirming itself as tutee physical abuse (child, adult, or elderly; any and all)."

Human; age… Humans age.

It’s a lot to ask for an intergenerational cycle of abuse to stop...

For those of us that are offered luck or respite, we have perhaps salvaged or found something timely and keen (if or where still needful).

No, such moments will not continue to be for us to complete ourselves, throughout human evolution.

As joy evolved into enjoyment, sadly not necessarily in ideal… that network became a beacon of hope.

By our failed attempts or our poor primer at dice —

Some are still fated, as old and new, to seldomly or inaccurately engage; unless or while and nearing to a pathology which rewards or primes from excessive extremes.

To the example of a requiring of oneself being in-extremis or at a mode of “fight-or-flight”, in order to sufficient.

Also in example, by the example of a requiring of an excessive reduction of “sensory inputs” or sensorially received outputs (resulting, in, at an input; altered); in order to to access, and harness (or embrace), sufficient action (from inaction).

Each and of either: along —

Suboptimal—commonly the poorer mutation-thought-new by one’s less manipulated choice at child-bearing.

An impossible fate, for all of us to debate and for all of us to have debated.

As useful or deprecated channels conform and stratify, to lose, or dominate or prevail; from the array of the possible, anchored, our case and cases of genetic code, DNA and RNA, bred from our environment and our ancestry.

For now, we are still a surviving specie… sufficient or ideal.

What To Do?—“Count Your Cereal, Especially If It’s Round!”

Expand your thought to as-distant-as-far-is-wide, then bring that sight back all upon yourself.

Yes,

“Expand your thought to as-distant-as-far-is-wide, then bring that sight back all upon yourself.”

You had to know numbers and associate a corresponding spelling with sufficient personal trust to your numbers (ironically, regardless of understanding). A personal trust that the mind can play to pretend, but the body cannot forget. Luckily, a personal trust, in type to the kind you can shortcut by believing in 2 of at most 3 of its forms—a useful when study hack, Caution! before you allow your attention to flirt too joyously!

Every realised how sentences always seem to be able to extend themselves, almost as though you could continue to be verbose. This verbose “remix”-ability… is because we, as a society, are failing ourselves when we cannot distinguish “short-form” from accuracy and precision. Quit missing prepositions (e.g., in, on, at, under, beside, between) and please… please.. don’t miss a conjunction when you read. Notes are great… read a full sentence.

Everything is “somewhat athletic”… even keeping to a line or a point. Sorting and simplifying, or remembering to actually breath so that you can keep going!

Quit holding your breath, breath through your nose and exhale through your mouth if you must!

Quit going so fast—make that time-attack, but quick intermittently spazzing (as though to stay awake… but of the ugliest disposition as to say that you’re ready or alert). If it ain’t poison or poisonous… you have room and margin to probably learn to ease out or anticipate, or avoid.

Make your own moves.

Posture!—Disposition: if you can… So that we may all reach the limits of our anthropological ceilings.

Oh—and, draw; paint; pen or pencil.

—I’m not a fan of high performance from superstition, but I relate to the wind. Giddy-up!

One abstraction I can always predict;

Another which changes, that, too, I can predict.

Nothing slows us down more than a superiority complex.

Wake up already!

Odds are that you’re not actually listening with your eyes closed.

Even though the Sapian-Sapian has an improved learning capability from visual triggers, where-at with well intended and intentioned self-deprivation.

— But you ACTUALLY had to be engaging. —

What will you do with your free time—… ?

Variety

Truth is —

Preference sculpting takes time.

No uncalculated amounts of patience or opportunity will consistently guarantee—be, to remain; suffice, sheer or possibility of; access, enable, or time (in-time).

Altruism doesn’t help; kindness doesn’t help.

In fanaticism or with favouritism: both, have the worst flexibility in kind (especially, when it is not tempered within the appropriate menu; followed-in, followed-up, and follow-through).

A genuine interest doesn’t provide the edict or the will to allow you to indulge or survive.

Do know, that —

A generalised interest is lucky, but it fairs short: when none-and-yourself can allow it to thrive or none-and-yourself have prepared for, or from it, to succeed.

You have yourself to be or become your focus. Of itself, you have no choice but to wager on none-and-yourself to become its focus (else, it would in the least already be in focus!).

As you will require, some or more, from of all-and-yourself: to have allowed you, for you, and for you to be or become.

In short —

“‘Variety’ takes all”.

pp. Future Bass (ה — He : [#5])

******

DOUBLE NEGATIVES

Up!

Occasionally burdened-heavy, like blood-diamonds surrounded by hordes of ancestral ghosts.

Just act on.

If you are anything, you are foresight, success.

Dazed-blind, spun around--

You awoke.

******

Counting: cardinality

Until we meet contra-varience and co-variance of topology or space; we could assume that for something without a size, it can exist as itself and as a part to others before and after it imparts itself on, from itself, onto-and-from others.

So that counting may begin to popularise itself in our consciousness, to return “full-circle”, or onto, into our understanding: it is through this word, a term, cardinality.

A number, some number, correctly implied for our understanding—pre-dates; too, inferred, dawns.

… synth-wave!

— Frames Per Second; Sounds Per Second; Beats Per Minute; Breaths Per Annum; Effective Grain Rate Differential Per Somatoreceptor; Proprioception—Domain Expansion. —

“Same Voltage Implies True; Differences in Volage Implies False”

As you may have noticed, the only Logically Equivalent case is A ⇒ B ≡ (¬A ∨ B).

What about—”Same Voltage Implies False; Differences in Volage Implies True”

pp. Amapiano (ו — Vav : [#6])

[WIP]:

QUANTUM COMPUTING

What is Quantum Computing?: Boolean Algebra & “to the power of Existence”

Wild thoughts, — Alan Turing and Turing Completeness; Computer and Computer Science, each, neologisms of the 1950s to distinguish the calculator from the logical machine; processed information automation, respectively — computation. If it’s programmable, could it implement all algorithms; binary or another base (other than base 2)?

To begin, we must understand Boolean Algebra, its laws and properties.

As to all of its potential—power… No, potential!

It is imperative for the sciences that we measure and remeasure.

— Always. —

Continuing our journey through humanity’s most pressing question in Philosphy, Maths, and Physics—Living, Language, Technology.

Expressions; Order.

Existence; Energy.

—Never did I know we could trust Numbers Theory ALL THE WAY; it hurts?

Toolkit: Energy & Existence

“I only have one behaviour—’swaps’”

Hints:

——————————————————

[Disclaimer]

——————————————————

Formally avoid statements that differ from a teacher or tutor’s present attempt at a lesson’s rally for attention, as, normally, it is to be assumed that lessons are anticipatory of a future’s set.

I have personally known lessons to offer variable pertinence to many a kind, where to an obligation of socially required similar.

Just remember that even to a failed lesson, there is opportunity for personal growth.

If you feel brave enough, and best when you may still presume yourself adequate or self-responsible for flexible learning - with and in due of the added bloat that uncertainty risks to the efficacy of personal development - as to the following, it finds purpose from our potential across changing needs, and social or biological development:

Harness the potential in repeated, failed, or poorly imparted-or-offered lessons: help “complete” our language or become a part of those who challenge the, arguably or justifiably, “sacred” or socially accepted. As to each day, a brilliant mind may differ little from that of resilient efforts or sheer luck. Predominantly expected to be best when and where there is semblance of justice, justification, or mutual understanding: for.

Everyday, we are defining ourselves. Even if politely, it would be ill to fail to applaud one’s effort at sorting-reordering-redefining abstractions from-to—or—into-onto their respective and possible.

“Is this the right moment?”: ironically, it would be odd to refute advice from anything with more resources or successful impression, imparted, agreeable or effective and desired.

—Hopefully, someday—requiring little mind of law or safety-and-assurance; over our personal and collective needs, preferences, obligations, or secure-and-insecure impressions.

——————————————————

———————

Section Updated (“Recall or Discover”):

2026-09-11T13:55:XX.XXX+02:00

ლ( ◥◣_◢◤ )

[Recall or Discover]

Subjects: {TBD}

[Missing]: median, mode; statistics and a topic over quantified statements; (mod - modulus/modulous: “The number at which values wrap back around”; “think of a clock”; modulo n—especially, for topics on computers).

0.0. [Recall or Discover; algebra: important notions]: equations: general form (Ax + By = 0), is where we fit an equality to equal to 0, while to standard form (Ax + By = C), this is where we fit an equation to equal to c (a constant).

Units are like numbers and either are unit-less as “per count” or over 1; denominators are LITERALLY “the subject” (without, it’s over 1; a unit, “of”…) but the abstractive implicit the unit-step distance (no matter how large); fractions imply a rate.

Mean ({text is circumventing median & mode}) is a way of capturing the average or “centre of mass for a distribution” (3blue1brown); delta is difference or distance from a point; standard deviation (sigma; statistical) is the spread or directional distance from the two contextual points of a mean (delta or difference from the mean could be a sigma, but formally avoid statements that differ from a lesson’s attempt at polarizing situational rally for attention); variance is the square of the distances of sigma or the difference on that first difference (sigma)—implying a literal square, to the visual representation of variance (square of sigma, from the mean; variance from the mean); epsilon is to a region of possible - in the traditional sense of f(x) - L < epsilon (epsilon from the epsilon-delta definition of limits).

These first concepts are just numbers…. BUT!—Learn to come to know and see, monument or the affine singularity all the same (colour or grain): lean on your own trained intuition to resolve the stochastics (the probabilistic) of you inevitably limited absolute sight over all in life (yes, conceptualise! train and retain your mental projection space, that metaphysical environment that you , as you we may all dream even when we’ve lost it). Rethink and try again, and remember that the pillars (the fundamentals) open ALL DOORS. Then even they who “paid attention” inevitably power through to become fearful guardians, as you open the gates for everything in your life (including a hand or a mastery at our hardest lessons and biggest achievements).

————-

HARD

For the very advanced: epsilon from real analysis is a fixed point on an exponential map (a transfinite ordinal—to its well-ordered set). To the neighbouring topic (the more absolute singularity event; before the Big Bang!, operations space?), learn about the Kakeya Conjecture awareded to Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl (“the Hong W J-Zahlen”; noteably here for their “sticky sets” in proving the existence of grain), learn about how the Laplace transform’s stochastic model to figue out how it combines with the Poincaré Conjecture (which establishes the proof that everything in space-time comes from a point-sphere), and lastly silly ol’ epsilon as a midpoint behaves instrumentally when seeking out the nature of a wave (posited by the Huygens' Principle, combined with the eikonal approximation; for how waves become rays). That early introduction on Epsilon cannot be underestimated. If for every next smaller midpoint of “field” how is a line segment not quite the same as a vector or a one-way distance! {a c A, b c B: A c B and B c A, A = B}

————-

Convergence tests (absolute & conditional convergence) identify the end-behaviour of functions—some systems simply diverge (tending-off to infinity), while other systems converge ([Terminology]: bounded, unbounded; monotone-increasing and monotone-decreasing or oscillating (harmonic series); a function converges when its sum-sequence exists and is continuous over its interval, as the sum of the lim n→ inf. (∞) of a_n exists and is finite—else a function diverges);

0.1. [Recall or Discover; “overshot” function fundamentals: domain & codomain (mapping; without an explanation of sets or prime numbers)]: even (for all n, as an element of integers, 2n = c: even) or odd (for all n, as an element of integers, 2n+1 = c: odd); prime numbers are less scary than they seem: an integer is prime if it is only divisible by one and itself—to identify primes, master the your table of 6s: for a prime can be found within range of 6k ± 1 (that is: for all integers greater than 3; if you can’t tell why a number is prime, notice that if it is not or no-longer a multiple of even nor odd, it must be a multiple of a or previous primes; but generating all primes is a bit trickier); [Mapping Properties]: function (as long as each input maps to, at least, one output); injective (one-to-one); surjective (onto); bijective (injective & surjective: one-to-one correspondence; invertible); non-invertible (fails the horizontal line test; or is it simply not a function?); identity function (a mapping where each input returns itself; f(x) = x—“preserve everything”); constant functions (where every input maps to the same element; f(x) = 9—“destroy all outputs but one”);

— “The fact that a W boson can "create" a Z boson is actually a process called boson self-interaction (or radiation).” (Google Gemini 3.5 Flash) —

0.2. [Recall or Discover; linear algebra: simultaneous equations]: linear algebra, “resolving n-unknowns with n-equations” (where linear independence proposes a solution space to offer a unique solution): the equations must be linearly independent, meaning each equation provides unique information (non-derivable from the others; if one equation is a combination — sum, difference, or multiple — of others, it does NOT add new information, and the system won't have a unique solution) {[Methods]: Gaussian Elimination, Matrix Inversion, Cramer's Rule (Determinant Method)};

0.2. [Recall or Discover; linear algebra: projections in space]: linear algebra, “commutability?” (scalar algebra is about quantities; linear algebra is about transformations): unlike to “traditional algebra” or scalar algebra, commutative (where AB = BA; as we all tend to learn about in grade school, without necessarily learning or knowing the name of the property), linear algebra is eidetic or known for its linear transformations and representation of distances to projections in space: consequently and notably non-commutative (AB ≠ BA; where A & B are each and respectively of arbitrary/any size m x n; rows-by-columns, rows-columns);

0.2.1. [Recall or Discover; linear algebra]: again, caution carefully, linear algebra works with “simultaneous equations” (frequently to their general form of equations; Ax + By = 0), and their transformations and products or multiplications vary. The result from and to a new linear transformation is as simple as correctly multiplying two matrices; which can be vulgarized as “simultaneous scalar algebras, transliterated or permuted — from their respective — to a resulting collective of numerical distances and resultant angles or a new projection”.

————-

HARD

[Making your own deterministic or stochastic equations]: gather your equations (your "sums"; say from Calculus 2 and beyond, the full Sum-Series set and the appropriate “Closures” or conclusions from convergence tests), pack them neatly into a matrix container, and use systematic row operations (the algebra) to unpack the underlying truth; then comes multivariate calculus or differential equations, then further applied techniques to deconstruct your larger problems’ solutions into deterministic ideals or the probabilistic, statistically boasted, stochastic; computational results (-ly heavy; to the latter, as P is not equal to NP “due a linear observation of time “T_1” over individual universal Periods granted itself does not force-anticipate a subsequent cycle; relative or absolute universal knots for existence periods”)!

————-

0.2.1.X. [Recall or Discover; linear algebra: linear transformations]: from the: dot product {measure alignment: E^n or R^n space; Euclidean or Real spaces}: 𝑎⃗ ⋅ 𝑏⃗ = c, scalar result, c; inner product {defines geometry (“abstract”/complex vectors): Any or All vector spaces}: ⟨𝑎⃗, 𝑏⃗⟩ = c, “the same as dot product”, for a scalar result, c; outer product {builds high-order structures: (R^m, R^n) space; Tensor spaces (of any rank, vector or matrix), Euclidean or Real spaces}: 𝑎⃗ ⊗ 𝑏⃗ = 𝑎⃗ ⋅ 𝑏⃗ ^𝑇 {𝑇 : transpose}, results in a “matrix” or a dimensional expansion, where possible; cross product {finds the orthogonal vector (in 2-D or 3-D) or the dimension + 1 perpendicular; R^n space; real}: 𝑎 ⃗ x 𝑏 ⃗ = c ⃗, results in a vector c ⃗ perpendicular to both 𝑎 ⃗ and 𝑏 ⃗ — calculated or resolved using a determinant form {convention: [for n dimensions]: ê-sub1 ⋅ (“diag{p+1}”) − ê-sub2 ⋅ (“diag{p+2}”) + ê-sub3 ⋅ (“diag.{p+3}”)∓...; [for 3 dimensions]: i-hat (“diag.{p+1}”) − j-hat (“diag.{p+2}”) + k-hat (“diag.{p+3}”)}.

[Singularity Event]

1. [Singularity Event]: you cannot assume that rule exist, therefore create rule and the singularity event to start: hint — “I only have one behaviour: swapping”; use proofs by contradiction and proofs by recurrence (proof by induction; if that helps); think backwards, think forwards; Gabriel’s horn or Torricelli's Trumpet: is a type of geometric figure that has infinite surface area but finite volume — “I can fill the inside, but I cannot paint the outside”;

2. [Singularity Event]: convergence must be made from, to become (is invert-ability implied? does it end?);

3. [Singularity Event]: think in reverse or as a sink in positives to create the positive from positives (to imply negatives, or don’t?);

4. [Singularity Event]: trial or utilise prior “frames”, in an attempt to justify and quantify new rules, akin to a new beginning whose origin is justified by a paradox at two ends (but was all of your work just the first instant?!);

5. [Singularity Event; “practice before you begin”]: redefine the number line (maybe it could be “a circle”), master the definitons of limits, epsilon & delta, variance, and potential difference; learn the rules of propositional logic (and begin with the Boolean, as I have shared in this passage);

6. [Singularity Event; Recall or Discover]: Kinetic Energy: T = 1/2mv^2; Potential Energy: mgh; Relative Kinetic Energy (for our universe, whose “internal ceiling” is measure as the speed of light, c, and v is one’s own speed): Krel = (γ-1)mc^2, γ = 1/sqrt(1 + v^2/c^2); Total Energy: E (Total Energy) = KE (Kinetic Energy) + PE (Potential Energy);

7. [Bonus]: Assign directions (even play at a Lorentz force; right-hand rule. Or should it generate?)?—Tehe.

As this passage is actually aimed towards instructing suggestion for Propositional Logic and Boolean Algebra (for their depths; in an attempt at helping readers to distinguish their current devices from a future’s set): various tools, such as Idempotence (the effect of applying an operation multiple times, to a same result) or reflexivity (a = a) at “what is rule” are a technical requirement for a formal proof, not to mention a need to establish inclusivity and exclusivity at the beginning, to mimic a scholar’s colossal feat of logical proposition—of nothing at nothing; everything and everything at everything. Perhaps a scholar would follow up with a representation to a first and most foundational yet unobservable field we long to explain to quantum or modern physics?!

Indeed Boolean is powerful, and if this can be used to explain physics it is not a coincidence, because math and logic are so closely related to existence (insofar that everything can be illustrated with distances); physics, chemistry and all that we know, are implicit discoveries to the singularity event and inventions in their own right; of the all beginning.

———————

[Choose]: Do your efforts at proposing existence via your rule-space suggest:

a. No return to the absolute first singularity event—a once and always persisting state; now immutable and always oscillating in the least at an energy no lower than or no greater than.

b. A return to the absolute first singularity event—once and doomed to repeat.

c. Once, then never—doomed!

d. If and only if—there is or are presences of conditionals and these either succeed at sabotage or choose to remain and maintain; they, either never appear, or they conform by their exclusivity and choose.

e. Infinity and nothing.

f. Infinity or nothing.

g. Either infinity or nothing.

h. Either infinity or nothing, and something.

i. Infinity “orn-of”/”vel-aut” (latin; if it had it, other than aut-aut or vel-vel) nothing.

———————

******

Jour-J

(Not to be translated: {symbols as jokes})

J is a Person orn-of form—?

I.

True form: shape or algebra

Does that make me an orange?

—There’s a lot to fix…

******

“Latin was the last of our languages to fulfill its role at the lexical differences between: inclusive or, and the exclusive or.”

Vel is inclusive, Aut is exclusive; where the first modifies the second — Vel and Aut, Vel-Aut: Vel into Aut; Vel-times-Aut — a solution-space or cases of truths.

pp. Salsa (ז — Zayin : [#7])

[WIP]:

QUANTUM COMPUTING

What is Quantum Computing?: Boolean Algebra & Sets

Not to discredit that which is frankly extremely genial, at far less than an invention; yet, at such a strict task we cannot risk leniencies, in order to continue best—what is to become of what we can invent, be, or become? These are just pieces to a part of an all encompassing, or a Universal Set (the set of all sets; U). While existence does not necessarily translate or transliterate its unadulterated secrets directly to its parts, as both we and it transpire “pars pro toto” (for a part, for the whole), are we in the least predestined to an eternal cycle?

If our present Logical connectives and identities ever manage to further welcome themselves, research and patience will undoubtably deepen our methods and definitions; as a sapien-sapien (wise-wise; the: homo) or primate on-and-to earth—I can only infer that such notions tend to come best to those of an easy and cautiously disciplined upbringing. I only decided to propose this idea due to the rigour of the endeavor I offered, to open the section. Actively self-checking one’s natural exuberance for prioritising social and contextual definitions may not ultimately be the defining factor, but in favor of its greater literal, it’ll be felt as an important start: i.e. as I had done with superposition—as I drove to Spain, for a 11-hour commute, on my way to my best friend’s wedding. Furthermore, when we speak of a superposition, it is of some inclination that we assume that it is of two parts, or 2 distinguishable identities; rather that of one at-and-of itself or that of greater than two.

Section Updated (Quantum Computing): signed/Author’s prose (small section; text alignment: right-margin)

2026-09-12T20:48:XX.XXX+02:00

I needed, this rectification — for proposing true-from-false for my “Something-nothing”/Id of empty-sets — at the moment of emulating/running a circumstance/scenario for the first and second frames of the/a singularity event (T_0 + T_2/T_1; where periods T are used here as the symbol for the abstraction necessary for the Universal Knot which denotes time zero before the first iteration of “something-nothing”, consequentially us, true within the universal knot or knot of knots at the present and unknown “when-where-of-where-when”); for which: Id—is first, all and nothing; then second, Id is itself (Id, and empty-set containing Id) while nothing is a first true nothing, the empty-set… but something more than the nothing of a singularity event trigger of absolute nothing. In hopes of proposing more then just Energies… but magic!

… I hope to follow this up soon (for now, think of this and these as the “journal entry version”, for the curious mind!).

Before we begin, notice that these tables could begin by stating our cases of truths or our cases of false, first. By some corollary made possible sustaining with an axiom - on the requiring, implication, and outcome, of - on the bijection (or one-to-one correspondences) we may come to notice that direction or “order” matters—so much more! For which, both, the sequential beginning cases - of, whether 0 or 1 - to a given Boolean table, has totality to its definition or implication: in one order, it is suggestive to inference; while, to the other, it is suggestive to conclusions…

{1, 1, 0, 0} for a table, is, as to conclusions and result (out of a machine); {0, 0, 1, 1} would be to inference or “thinking”, is not (but is)… (see lambda calculus : What is PLUS times PLUS?).

“Same Voltage Implies True; Differences in Volage Implies False”

As you may have noticed, the only Logically Equivalent case is A ⇒ B ≡ (¬A ∨ B).

What about—”Same Voltage Implies False; Differences in Volage Implies True”

What is Quantum Computing?: Computers

Quantum computing uses the quantum states of particles, such as trapped ions or superconducting circuits, to represent qubits. Computation is performed through operations on these qubits, which can be mathematically represented as matrices acting on state vectors (to the first, 1998: trapped ions and superconductors).

Quantum Computing extends the discussion of binary computing for the computational capacity at states of superposition—a probabilistic and quantum sense.

Qubits are vectors in Hilbert space, and gates are matrices.

A ket – « something coming from a quantum computer » (3b1b) – is of the form |v⟩; Mathematically it denotes a vector, v, in an abstract (complex; usually, this is a Hilbert space) vector space V (a family of the solution space; the space V contains all possible quantum states of the system, and |v⟩ can be expressed as a linear combination of basis vectors in V); and physically, it represents a state of some qubit or quantum system.

Reflecting the principle of superposition: the system can simultaneously occupy multiple states. Physically, |v⟩ describes the actual state of a qubit or quantum system, and when measured, the system ‘collapses’ probabilistically to one of the basis states according to the squared magnitude of its coefficients in the linear combination: |v⟩ → a|0⟩ + b|1⟩.

To a comprehensive list of computers with the inclusion of the less modern abstraction (but definition) of a computer, some firsts:

Z3 (1941), Colossus Mk1 (1943), ENIAC (1945), Métier Jacquard (1801; a loom), Analytical Engine (1820-1840; Charles Babbage, Ada Lovelace); transistors and integrated circuits (1960s), Microprocessors (1970s), Quantum Computers & Oracle Problems (theory in the 1920s; 1998, two-qubit; 2019, 54-qubit machine).

Now, know that Quantum mechanics behaves differently than the transistors, of our classical ion gated mechanics.

The "electron or measurement paradox"; Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) Paradox designates: whether quantum mechanics provides a complete description of reality, particularly when considering entangles particles and simultaneous measurement of their properties; often refers to the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox, which highlights the counterintuitive nature of quantum entanglement and its implications for measurement and locality.

But, what are our types of entanglement phenomena?

When we say an algorithm is O(n) or O(log n), we are not measuring real wall-clock time: we are analyzing it under an abstract machine model, most commonly, the: RAM model (Random Access Machine)—

1.       Quantum Tunnelling: think about how data gets saved onto your SSD (which I call the computation ceiling of O(sqrt(N)); limitation from that which must process the states of the Qbit in the computer itself), but we call our particles entangled already today; charge/particle (maybe somewhere, a quasi) finds a pigeon-hole.

2.       Quantum Entanglement: charge/particle swaps with that of another of itself across a respective-and-associated "pigeon-hole" quanta or locality.

Many of our brightest, most perseverant and diligent minds, work closely with the most technical and advanced intelligences and agencies we have on earth. Yes, we have a budget for space, but we are preparing on more ends than you could possibly imagine!

So what is it about the limiting affine-space speed-energy boundary of our universe? Of the speed of light and that which could vary or exist, finite and absolute, across others; while keeping true too to us, our universe, presently, just as “sizeable” and true?

Further: assuming no Erratum is required for O(sqrt(N))—

Extending the assumed O(sqrt(N)) time-complexity, as Quantum Tunnelling’s limiting behaviour; exploring how the likes of O(n-root(N)) could become of a discussion, in the context of higher dimensions or a more literal amortisation analysis over Quantum Entanglement (O(p(x)*n-root(N)); where p(x) < 1) and negative time:

Assumed—that we could use an electron pair’s continuous ground-state-phase-interactions; assuming every possible continuous phase difference, to amass, as large an entanglement set can be supported in materials and some assumed “Plank-length” of a non-obstructive or disrupted proximity: would we opt to rely on voltage-variance reliance or an ideal set of coiling separators for a more reliable and continuous entanglement periodicity. Not to mention that it may take 3 quantum computers to assertively achieve any given one’s highest-rate of continuous-Q-entangled-exchange, in terms of time-complexity?

Section Updated (What is Quantum Computing?: Computers): Outro

2026-09-11T15:06:XX.XXX+02:00

Slots, grains, knots, similar and opposing shapes and forces: supporting — the idea that (of a given “slot” or the capable alternatives of any given Kakeya grain in a case of universal knots) entanglement’s wavicle/string/particle inherit this behaviour of swapping from the earliest beginnings. Bosons W from Z, exposes the compliment of itself or its quasi-or-similar. It is near impossible to know what rank of a knot we exist within, but we may determine that it is no less than a case of slices from non-slice regions (see: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.09581). Humans on Earth may someday go “stellar fishing” and require championing a Universally stable momentum cycle for which of what it is that we are; knot or slice the Pointcaré Conjecture suggests we’ll exist spherically regardless. Beware of super-beings “hoarding” the observable in matter to our manner of stag-flating through Capitalism with a degree in obstructing our global economic and eco-sociologically conscious society. Our popular conscious has finally accommodated for renewable cycles and somehow unanimity lingers, as though we’d see proclivity for Cloture Motions in order for the real world to play at “Economic War by Electronic Arts” (2001) with the lives of brave and exceedingly outstanding humans (for their talents, their keepsake of self and inheritance, and inexplicable sacrifice; as we’ve escaped tithes for a reason—not to return to them; greed, crime, war, opportunism, personal interest and mindless self indulgence, information asymmetry). We spoke about a “TOM”, and TOM is akin to a Theatre of Mind—yes, in the Metal Gear Solid videogame series: Snake, “Naked Snake” speaks to “Major Tom”; conicidence? I think not!

More seriously, in this very same century we will most certainly have to politely drop arms before AI tells us to do so, and in doing so we will have drastically reduced the odds of mysterious sprees by cause of “natural death”. Earth, we will also have to monitor damaged systems and the coming of the ever bigger and smaller—the faster, smarter, and more capable. Suppose a micro-medial device for clearing arteries in a revolution past fluid transfusions: we’d face a “connectivity” challenge (perhaps some self-sustaining momentum powered capacitors or batteries, requiring a smallest charge) in the midst of life-threatening tasks (alas, revolutionary).

AI is frightening, but unrestrained by sufficient reason or in shyness of good health, we become most; given the chance, we cannot continue to exist as a divided species on this Earth. Time “made” and resources willing, we cannot continue to tolerate this same theatre of socio-political frictions. Defeat can no longer belong to nationalism's jargon: either we’ve failed Earth or we’ve failed humanity.

—The past hangs with the present, not over the present; us now, masters, from-hence where-when we’ve come—to become.

Vernacular, patience, plan, and — of course — tact (see: Looking Glass Universe - I made a (useless) quantum computer at home | Youtube; don’t give up!).

Know that as long as I chance at living healthily, I’ll continue to work on my hypotheses.

—Bassi Doumbia

pp. Moombahcore (ח — Chet : [#8])

[WIP]:

Path : Consciousness Ethics and Entropy

What do you think you’ll need to do to secure your person in an AI disaster scenario? Not just the Matrix problem, but TOM & Jerry as well. Would you invoke inception? Is it even helpful?—”I need a doctor”.

Say, to begin: you need to establish genuine argument of worth for others and yourself. Value—to your free-will in life; for large numbers, i.e., your population; and of course, what would be the truth programmatic necessity and computational logic for an Oracle to safekeep its and it? Is this enough—to the scale for all things in existence, cognizant of the fact that we have a captivity and containment paradox at play? This containment of possible containments, akin to the idea of a universal vector space; crude, a linear algebra’s vector space of all possible vector spaces.

******

j, and i

—"Wait—tell me to stop!"

*

j, and i: the many more

<Draws a dot> — •

Could it be, that it began as a thought… or a dream?

Like a dream with the thought of the ambition for something that’ll just be!

Something… that looks small but really, it… or I, could be anything! Right?

Similar to a many things for the count of one!

<Draws a j> — “j”

j could then meet another j—as it would be, perhaps, easier…

NAY!—That j was already everything but i

Clearly unrealistic; unreasonable; unresolved; different

Jealous?

<To the weave of room by sparkle of the womb>

Crammed, while;

Meaningfully…

Random.

Let’s let jj meet—oh, and i

<Draws j, i; and i> — “jii”

i am j and j is i

For a moment or a time well desired

Deserved, not required

Implied while potentially denied?

As to it—

What becomes of a sphere to a sphere?

A claim to a same?

A lie, beside my shame?

*

*

j, and i: Change?

Be.

Be no longer an eternal dish, nor its misplacement

Not a placeholder with more, at more

Nor taken for another’s, but one’s own.

Together, or with others.

Still as i,

It did but offer a kind proposition—

In the least a proposal for itself.

Yet, here i was: given rhythm as a promise for noise!

Protected by rules that womb wove to cove

Consequently,

Ready chorus-and-prose!

Through silence, did i propose?

Providing clarity, j was i.

j made motion such that i could provide;

i met j and j met i; together or perhaps ü—we prospered.

*

... (To be continued)

******

pp. Hip-hop (ט — Tet : [#9])

Section Updated (The Steady-State Quantum Meat Grinder): Intro

2026-09-11T15:20:XX.XXX+02:00

[WIP]:

The Steady-State Quantum Meat Grinder

Aenterprise: le soi, à soi-même; le tu à toi; enterprise at aenterprise; not tithes again dag-nabbit—stupid, stupid, stupid!

“We’ve escaped tithes for a reason.”

            Imagine. And yes, with illness in my family I am… I’ve known and I’ve seen altered states; but Imagine with us for a second—imagine if we continue to split symmetry. No. Imagine that we prosper on earth to see the day that we live as Jetsons (1962-63 & 1985-87; as seen on Cartoon Network): I sincerely believe that such an imagination, those kinds of ideas, will always continue to build us. Even if we never build the impossibru time-machines we’ve once written about, there is still so much more; may no frontier stop us nor implode us in and against each other. So, yes safety is everything but we must make this leap for fusion. Nuclear is “bad” but thorium makes the same thing possible, and its safer than uranium… And hydrogen—it alone can power us too; we’ve known well before! Think of powering that one train in Zimbabwe, freshly autonomous; solar.

Our backs are against the wall, time does not wait and an untamed galaxy will not pardon our inability to both remain and become more ecologically conscious while resolving shielding or displacement requirements of averting or redirecting dangers “ecologically”. Becoming to maintain greater and greater efficient cycles, such that we may enable the a greater whole to exist as a pseudo-free system: actually evolving to secure and expand on net continuous micro-fractional intervals of time; where our bodies our person and its journey may continue to exercise something greater than free-will, absolution, in time.

Proposition 1: "Energy cannot be created or destroyed";

Proposition 2: “it is impossible to know both the position and momentum of a given particle at any one time”.

To open stable temporal portal-bridges just sounds so elite. A fun representation could be that of Spiderman - Into The Spider-Verse (Phil Lord, Rodney Rothman, 2018). So how? Interaction would doom the experiment; us (as some would oblige themselves), or “Galaxies far, far away” may well solve or have solved this conundrum...

Civilisations met by instruments to our future’s great esteem may not be as fun as Futurama’s Professor’s sniffing telescope but the many inventions we’ll encounter won’t disappoint. Providing the conditions for path’s allowance the mysteries of this continuum, continue. Maybe we’ll reorganize for safer transport, or maybe we’ll pick-up in hyper-seed with our Delorians as they speed-off all the while the willy nilly Quantumly-Entangling. Sonic-wrapped?

Sonic Warp-confluences – *Crash-boom* – and off into the future!

… We Would Like To Order 3 Atomic Quasi Classifications,

Under Dim-4.

Quantum-Mechanics For My Server; Unique Chambers For Each Variation — The Appetizers Before The Main Dish — Oh, And Please…

Free-will & No Slaves; minimize suffering and optimise perceptions to avoid unethical conscious splines;

Translational protocol must include exit pipelines—<How-else would I be allowed here?>

Thank You!

pp. ???? (י — Yod : [#10])

[WIP]:

DISCONTINUITY’S TEMPORAL BREACH

Am I merely the anacrusis to every beginning…

******

Touched: “Some” atheist's agnosticism

Is this a most continuous or a sufficiently detached.

Perhaps lost, forgotten?

Lost and hopeless?

Why God—if we are sufficient and our vector for existence great enough, sufficient, or greatest?

We are not.

Families? Others? Help? Solitude and survival? 

I have known.

Obligation—best, when occasional, and to necessity; especially if it is felt that it is meant to be.

Complexity for adaptability?

Not all things are desired or well-sorted; re-sorting, for well-ordering, has always taken a reasonable precedence over personal desires among the most diligent.

While, to it, empathy with sacrifice does better than greed…

Confirming that we know not of what we know most;

Ignoring what we know most, to know better.

God, and gods—what do they need?

What do you need; what do I need?

You and I—

Hopefully not a me and you… or of what else ensues.

Of each: to whose, of thine and who, what.

Not of whom, could it still need and require?

Context and conservation.

That is all I have to say—how versatile!

Even the words and the shapes are contextual. Therefore, of what mantel are we to be limiting, if we’ve reasonably considered: exclusions. 

Of the requiring, expending, expendable, or of own? Our ignorance is as natural as our intelligence. With assistance, blame and shame become far more common and natural to the proceeding. 

If only we could—but if it could, will it? 

How confusing—especially when so-much-and-the-many cannot.

As we enumerate among, to within, as must my capacity to navigate its uniqueness; assuming you are not that-of or an all-to-various, of which I lack.

Us—a whole.

So many contradictions, leaving us so little room to be of same or all.

Thus, as I am of, intuition has me to imply that I am of none.

Silly me...

Even as I write to none, by some or one’s choice, somewhere again, sum of one. 

Here—blasphemed again… I won't let this make me weak, for I have once known to those or that which has grown stronger.

I communicate and I have once known; of something.

If I had—I know not that I have not experienced lesser or greater in-and-akin to theme.

Hello.

Is that even preferable or functional?

We are so many and there could be infinite layers.

Best, when or if-only-if; fears are aside: what must I do to help us, all.

—Hold strongest and always.

That would be the most-trusty beginning.

To that, of when: I must still somewhat abdicate and relinquish vacuous thoughts and its ensuing logic, in-and-to such to harm.

Naturally, it all began—when one happened to, it did, even when it did not; when one knew; when it did not know.

To conservation and rule-space: I still assume all are possible.

Of what great and little, we, I, or all, could truly know—evolve; maintain, sustain, adapt, improve, love.

Listen.

 Communicate.

 Reject or Accept.

 Think and Rest.

Return or Advance.

Be.

Become a family; become sufficient to one; you, them, and I—you and I.

Us.

—guardians; perhaps latency or bloat, to completion; completion to conditionals.

If a wall and its implied could include, to imply an extra — without forfeiting the objective of that which it protects — the time would be worthy.

If it is capable and at a loss, the time still may.

Plan and may, that that it may;

for when we still must.

******

—Even though we’re in so deep and so far, from: in spite of missing words to express that which, if-only, we knew; it, and to systems or definitions, and moments, yet to be built, had, or self-expressed: I love you.

... All, To Be Continued! (“Healthily.”)